Thursday, 8 January, 2004, Tiny particles 'threaten brain'
By Alex Kirby
BBC News Online environment correspondent
Note that nano particles are also known contaminants of many of our common vaccnes, such as MMR and Polio. They are practically impossible to remove. JR.
Microscopic pollutant particles given off by traffic and industry can enter
the bloodstream and the brain after being inhaled, scientists have found.
The particles are known to cause lung damage in susceptible patients, and
are implicated in cardiovascular disease.
Experiments on rats and humans have now discovered they can penetrate further
into the body, with unknown results. UK scientists are calling for vigilance
over the finding, and over the possible effects of a new group of particles.
Many of us are routinely exposed to particles from diesel vehicle fumes
(these are normally known as PM10, from their size), which penetrate buildings
and are ubiquitous in cities. Some cooking stoves emit high levels of particles
as well. There is also occupational exposure for people making products like
sunblock cream, inks, photocopier toners, and working with welding equipment.
Subtle infiltrators
Ken Donaldson, Professor of Respiratory Medicine at the University of Edinburgh,
UK, said these sorts of particle were known to cause damage at the point of
entry to the human body. What was new, he said, was the discovery by researchers
in Europe and the US that they "can get to areas that bigger particles
cannot reach". Patients who inhaled radioactive ultrafine carbon particles
displayed traces of it in their bloodstream not long afterwards. Experimental
rats which inhaled similar particles showed a marked decline in particulate
level in their lungs after six or seven days.
In the olfactory bulb and other parts of the brain, though, levels (although
lower than in the lungs) remained relatively stable over the same period.
These very small pieces of matter are called nanoparticles, defined as anything
smaller than 100 nanometres in size. A nanometre is one-billionth of a metre,
80,000 times smaller than a human hair. Professor Donaldson said: "We
are already exposed to nanoparticles of different kinds. We already recognise
that there is some ill-health associated with these exposures. "But they
may also translocate away from their point of entry into the blood or the
brain. We are not sure what the consequences of this are yet.
Unknown hazard
"The nanotechnology revolution may design particles that are very different
chemically from the ones we are exposed to, and they might have very different
properties that made them more harmful. We should be vigilant." He told
BBC News Online: "I think there could be an increased future risk for
all of us, and also a higher risk for people exposed at present to nanoparticles
at work, though it's impossible to say how much bigger their risk is.
"These particles are not things you can trap with a filter. But they
do disperse rapidly, unlike asbestos." Nanotechnology involves building
working devices, systems and materials molecule by molecule, and exploiting
the unique and powerful electrical, physical and chemical properties found
at that scale. It has developed from advances in microscopy, materials science,
molecular-level manipulation, and the relationship between classical and quantum
physics.
The UK's Royal Microcopical Society and the Institute of Physics are holding a conference on the health implications of nanoparticles on 13 and 14 January at the Daresbury Laboratories in northern England.
|
Dedicated to justice, civil rights, health of body and of world |
The
Web
Inquirer
|
Edited and Compiled by Janine Roberts | ||
| ______________________________________ | June 30, 2004 |
![]() |
| About the Editor |
|
|
|
Join and be notified by email when articles are added to this site: email: Powered by NotifyList.com |
| Buy her books and films |